INGRAM ENTERPRISES AND AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY, APPELLANTS,
v.
MARK LANGSTON, APPELLEE
INGRAM ENTERPRISES AND AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY, APPELLANTS,
MARK LANGSTON, APPELLEE
611 So. 2d 115
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek a remand in this workers’ compensation appeal, showing that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. In these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
BOOTH, SMITH and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Oberist Saunders v. State, 148 So. 3d 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…defenses. The State properly concedes error on this ground, since no documents were attached to the trial court’s order that conclusively showed that the defendant was not entitled to receive post-conviction relief on this ground. See Hill v. State, 611 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (explaining that, in summarily denying a rule 3.850 motion, the trial court must attach portions of the record that refute the defendant’s claim). In ground II, the defendant argued that trial counsel was ineffective for failing…
-
Glasco v. State, 616 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…n of Glasco’s claim that evidence against him should have been suppressed,1 we reverse and remand to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach those portions of the record which refute Glasco’s remaining claims.2 See Hill v. State, 611 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). REVERSED and REMANDED with directions. GOSHORN, C.J., and COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. . This claim is procedurally barred because it could have been raised on direct appeal. See Kennedy v. State, 547 So. 2d 912 (Fla.1989).…
-
Lewis v. State, 135 So. 3d 387 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach those portions of the record that refute Lewis’s claim that his attorney misadvised him about his eligibility for the habitual offender sentence he received upon violating his probation.1 See Hill v. State, 611 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 5th DCA1993). REVERSED and REMANDED with directions. SAWAYA, PALMMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. . The court did not attach a copy of the violation of probation plea colloquy.…
Authorities Cited
- Arnold Lumber Co. v. Verner E. Harris, 469 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)