NEWMAN-GREENSTEIN REAL ESTATE CO., INC., AND LEO-JAESON CORPORATION, ETC., APPELLANTS,
v.
ARDC CORPORATION, F/K/A ARVIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
NEWMAN-GREENSTEIN REAL ESTATE CO., INC., AND LEO-JAESON CORPORATION, ETC., APPELLANTS,
ARDC CORPORATION, F/K/A ARVIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
611 So. 2d 537
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Harding Realty, Inc. v. Turnberry Towers Corp., 436 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Other
On Motion for Rehearing
As the July 14, 1986 letter expressly states that the July 1 outline does not include every detail, and as the June 23 letter also states that any agreement was subject to approval of appellee’s board of directors, we conclude that the transaction falls within the scope of Restatement (Second) of Agency § 445, comment d & illus. 5 (1958), and summary judgment was properly entered. We have carefully considered appellants’ argument to the contrary, but are not persuaded thereby. Rehearing denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cent. Dade Malpractice Tr. Fund v. Shapiro, 827 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…hree § 766.106(2) -notices of intent, which he had duly transmitted to his claims-made insurer. Recovery under the policy was therefore precluded as a matter of law. Section 627.409(1), Florida Statutes (1995). See MacCabees Life Ins. Co. v. Saberi, 611 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), and cases cited; Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Decheona, 610 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 623 So. 2d 493 (Fla.1993); de Guerrero v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 522 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Shelby…
Authorities Cited
- Harding Realty, Inc. v. Turnberry Towers Corp., 436 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)