PRINCESS CRUISES, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
DONNA J. EDWARDS AND KENNETH EDWARDS, HER HUSBAND, RESPONDENTS

Fla. 2d DCA | 1993-01-06
No. 92-02868
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.
611 So. 2d 598 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of an order compelling discovery is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, because it was not filed within thirty days of rendition of the order sought to be reviewed. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c). The petition herein was filed after the court denied the petitioner’s motion for rehearing addressed to the order on review. There is no provision in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure authorizing a motion for rehearing addressed to an interlocutory or nonfinal order. The petitioner’s filing of a motion for rehearing, even though the trial court entertained it, did not toll the time for filing the petition. See Potucek v. Smeja, 419 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Therefore, an appeal from the denial of the rehearing motion is not authorized and the purported motion for rehearing did not toll the time to seek certiorari review. See Bensonhurst Drywall, Inc. v. Ledesma, 583 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Ramos v. State, 456 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Helmich v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 136 So. 3d 763 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
    …unwavering thirty-day time limit. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(5); Frantz v. Moore, 772 So. 2d 581, 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). This is true even where the court erroneously takes up an unauthorized motion for rehearing. Princess Cntises, Inc. v. Edwards, 611 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Potucek v. Smeja, 419 So. 2d 1192, 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). What is not clear, and what we write to address, is whether a trial court may sua sponte decide to revisit a matter a party could not otherwise request the court revisi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw