WILLIAM F. CHILDERS, AS JOINT PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM GILES CHILDERS, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
LAWRENCE SCHACHNER, M.D., AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In a wrongful death action involving a minor child, a jury award to the non-negligent parent on a survivor's claim cannot be reduced by the comparative negligence attributed to the negligent parent.
Plaintiff sued for wrongful death of his son. The jury awarded damages on a survivor's claim but attributed 75% comparative negligence to the plaintif…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Comparative Negligence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff William F. Childers, as joint personal representative of the estate of his deceased son William Giles Childers, from a final judgment entered below on his survivor’s claim after a jury trial in a wrongful death action. The plaintiff contends that the trial court erroneously reduced the jury award returned in his favor by the 75% of comparative negligence which the jury found was attributable to his wife in the wrongful death sued upon. We agree and reverse based on a holding that in a wrongful death action involving a minor child, a jury award to the non-negligent parent on a survivor’s claim, as here, cannot be reduced by the percentage of comparative negligence attributed by the jury to the negligent parent for the wrongful death of the minor child. Gurney v. Cain, 588 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 4th DCA1991), rev. denied, 599 So. 2d 656 (Fla.1992); Singletary v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., 376 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA1979) (opinion by Grimes, J.).
We find no error, however, in the summary judgment entered below in favor of the defendant University of Miami on the alleged medical fraud claim which is also under review. The record conclusively establishes that (1) no misrepresentation of a material fact was made in this case, and (2) no legally cognizable reliance on the alleged fraud occurred in any event; thus a viable cause of action for fraud was clearly disproved in this record. American Int’l Land Corp. v. Hanna, 323 So. 2d 567, 569-70 (Fla.1975); Yanks v. Barnett, 563 So. 2d 776, 777-78 (Fla. 3d DCA1990), rev. denied, 576 So. 2d 295 (Fla.1991).
The summary judgment for the University of Miami is affirmed. The judgment on the survivor’s claim for William F. Childers is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter a final judgment for William F. Childers based on the jury award for the subject survivor's claim.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hudson v. Moss, 653 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…ndicate that the Hudsons should only be liable to Cassandra for 10% of her damages. § 768.81(3), Fla.Stat. (1993). However, section 768.81(3) yields to section 768.20 where the two conflict. See § 768.71(3), Fla. Stat. (1993); Childers v. Schachner, 612 So. 2d 699, 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Gurney v. Cain, 588 So. 2d 244, 245-46 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), rev. denied, 599 So. 2d 656 (Fla.1992). Consequently, Cassandra’s awards of $250,-000 against each of the Hudsons are affirmed. [*1073] We do find error, however, i…
-
In re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES-REPORT NO. 17-03., 236 So. 3d 919 (Fla. 2018)…cific determination by the jury of the survivor's comparative negligence, which would be applied only to reduce that survivor's recovery. See F.S. 768.20; Frazier v. Metropolitan Dade County, 701 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Childers v. Schachner, 612 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Gurney v. Cain, 588 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). SECTION 700 - CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, you have now heard all the evidence, my instructions on the law that you must apply in reaching your verdict and the cl…
-
…cific determination by the jury of the survivor’s comparative negligence, which would be applied only to reduce that survivor’s recovery. See F.S. 768.20; Frazier v. Metropolitan Dade County, 701 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Childers v. Schachner, 612 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Gurney v. Cain, 588 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). -7- SECTION 700 — CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, you have now heard all the evidence, my instructions on the law that you must apply in reaching your verdict and…
Authorities Cited
- Am. Int'l Land Corp. v. Hanna, 323 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 1975)
- Yanks v. Barnett, 563 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- Singletary v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 376 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Gurney v. Winton Ray Cain & Tena Cain & Bulldog Fence Co., 588 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)