SUN UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE
SUN UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE
612 So. 2d 718
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
There is no merit to appellants’ arguments for reversal of the summary judgment of foreclosure. We agree, however, that appellants are entitled to a hearing on the issue of reasonable attorney’s fees attributable to the foreclosure. There was no stipulation to determine fees by affidavit, the summary judgment motion did not reference fees, no notice was given of any hearing to determine fees and the record was inadequate to support an award of fees when the final judgment containing the fee award was entered.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
COWART, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
FRY v. FRY, 887 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…a trial judge — as trier-of-fact — “to personally hear the witnesses and observe their demeanor in the act of testifying ... leaves a gap in the proper procedure of trial.” Id.; see also In re N.C., 884 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Smith v. Smith, 612 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Reaves v. Reaves, 546 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Paragon Group, Inc. v. Hoeksema, 475 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Tompkins Land & Housing, Inc. v. White, 431 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Umscheid v. Umscheid, 724 So. 2d…