DONALD CRAIG GORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his convictions for possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia, arguing that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain the convictions. We reject appellant’s assertion and affirm the convictions without further elaboration.
Appellant also challenges an order revoking his probation, arguing that several of the violations cited in the written order were not proved at the revocation hearing. The state correctly concedes the need for a remand so that the trial court can conform its written revocation order to its oral pronouncements. On remand, the trial court should strike from its order the references to a violation of condition (10), and paragraphs B, C, F, G, H, I and J.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
BOOTH, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Greene v. Twistee Treat U S a, 302 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)…s."); Moultrie v. Consolidated Stores Int'n. Corp., 764 So. 2d 637, 639–40 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (holding that material issue of fact presented as to whether the pallet resting in aisle of retail store was open and obvious); Hadley v. Davjoy, Inc., 613 So. 2d 49, 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (holding that - 5 - jury question presented by poor lighting conditions which may have obscured step down from dance floor at wedding reception). Moreover, the open-and-obvious-condition principle "is certainly not a fixe…
-
Slaats v. Sandy Lane Residential, LLC, 59 So. 3d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…ons, where issues of fact or differing inferences from the facts exist, Florida courts generally choose to let a jury decide. See, e.g., Javits v. RSMO Independence Mgmt. Consultants, Inc., 738 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Hadley v. Davjoy, Inc., 613 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Hogan v. Chupka, 579 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Fletcher v. Petman Enters., Inc., 324 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Pensacola Rest. Supply Co. v. Davison, 266 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). Here, the plaintiffs presented…
-
Rice v. Whitehurst, 778 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…angerous conditions that are not obvious to them. See Casby, 520 So. 2d at 282. Generally, multiple floor levels do not create an inherently dangerous condition. Id.; Schoen, 436 So. 2d at 76; Hoag, 82 So. 2d at 139. See also Hadley v. Davjoy, Inc., 613 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). However, an uncommon design or mode of construction creating a hidden danger that a prudent invitee would not anticipate may transform multiple floor levels into an inherently dangerous condition. Casby, 520 So. 2d at 282 (citin…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence