AVERY JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-02-02
No. 92-1392
Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
613 So. 2d 127 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the arrest was without probable cause and the evidence found should have been suppressed.


Facts & Procedural History

Jones was stopped by an officer and arrested for trespass after refusing to identify a visitor at a public housing project. A subsequent search reveal…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Judge.

FERGUSON, Judge.

Jones was stopped by a Key West police officer and questioned as to his reason for being on the site of a public housing project. The suspicious conduct, articulated by the officer as the basis for the trespass arrest, was a refusal or inability of the defendant to give the name of a person he was there to visit. An ensuing examination of his mouth revealed trace amounts of a powdery substance which was confirmed as cocaine. We agree that the arrest was without probable cause and that the illegal substance found on Jones’s person should have been suppressed. Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963).

A trespass occurs, as to property other than a structure or conveyance, when a person, without being authorized, licensed, or invited, willfully enters upon or remains on another’s property “as to which notice, against entering or remaining is given, either by actual communication to the offender or by posting, fencing or cultivation....” § 810.09(1), Fla.Stat. (1991). No basis was articulated by the arresting officer as grounds for belief that the appellant had violated the statute. Particularly, there was no evidence of actual or constructive notice to the defendant against entering or remaining on the grounds of the public housing complex. Compare Fox v. State, 580 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA) (defendant’s conviction for trespass on public housing project sustained where police officer twice warned the defendant to leave premises but defendant defied the orders), rev. denied, 591 So. 2d 181 (Fla.1991). For that reason the search which followed was illegal.

We agree with the defendant that his conviction for resisting an officer without violence was also flawed because it was based on an unlawful arrest. Livingston v. State, 610 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw