CARLOS E. PACANINS, APPELLANT,
v.
CARMEN CLEARY DE PACANINS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-12-29
No. 92-1915
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.
613 So. 2d 481 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction because appel-lee has failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of irreparable harm because of unavailability of an adequate remedy at law. See Russell v. Florida Ranch Lands, Inc., 414 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA1982); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dissolve the temporary injunction.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • de Pacanins v. Pacanins, 650 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The husband’s motions were denied. However, the husband appealed the entry of the temporary injunction. This court reversed the injunction, and the mandate issued on April 1,1998. Pacanins v. De Pacanins, 613 So. 2d 481 (Fla.3d DCA 1992). Meanwhile, the wife obtained an ex parte order from the Venezuelan court issuing Letters Rogatory asking the trial court to freeze fifty percent of the certificate of deposit. When the husband attempted to enforce this court’s ma…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw