JOHN S. HOLMES, APPELLANT,
v.
TERESE L. HOLMES, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-01-19
No. 92-368
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
613 So. 2d 514 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1205 (Fla.1980); Benson v. Benson, 519 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Blackburn v. Blackburn, 513 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bardino v. Bardino, 670 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …home’s sale would be shared by the spouses, as argued by the husband, because the transfer took place during the marriage, under the instant facts, the home would be characterized as a marital asset under section 61.075(5)(a). See Holmes v. Holmes, 613 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA1993). Furthermore, the court erred in concluding the lis pendens on the property should be ordered dissolved. [*184] Acapulco Constr., Inc. v. Redavo Estates, Inc., 645 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (Lis pendens should not be dissolved…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw