STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
HARRIET SEGAL, ROSEMARIE POMA, CHARLOTTE SANDERS AND MAX TANENBAUM, APPELLEES
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
HARRIET SEGAL, ROSEMARIE POMA, CHARLOTTE SANDERS AND MAX TANENBAUM, APPELLEES
613 So. 2d 614
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
FARMER, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur. STONE, J., dissents with opinion.
Dissent
STONE, Judge,
dissenting.
In my judgment the record does not support the trial court’s decision to dismiss the information. United States v. Byrd, 765 F. 2d 1524 (11th Cir.1985).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Allen v. State, 662 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…resheet, the trial judge was permitted to bump the recommendation two cells upward, based on appellant’s separate, successive violations of his probation and community control. See Williams v. State, 594 So. 2d 273 (Fla.1992), and Morviani v. State, 613 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (“bumping” a guideline sentence one cell for violation of probation, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14), necessarily raises the “permitted range” by one cell also). However, pursuant to Felty v. State, 63…
-
Hudson v. State, 251 So. 3d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)…. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark F. Carpanini, Judge. Terry E. Hudson, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); Williams v. State, 594 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 1992); Morviani v. State, 613 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 611 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Coleman v. State, 647 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Brown v. State, 581 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Byrd, 765 F.2d 1524 (11th Cir. 1985)