ANDRE SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANDRE SMITH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
613 So. 2d 617
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1993)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s conviction is affirmed because it appears that appellant was aware of the risks involved in rejecting the plea offer prior to the prosecutor withdrawing that offer. See Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 98 S.Ct. 663, 54 L.Ed.2d 604 (1978). Appellant’s habitual violent felony offender sentence is affirmed under the authority of Ross v. State, 601 So. 2d 1190 (Fla.1992); Tillman v. State, 609 So. 2d 1295 (Fla.1992); Becker v. State, 612 So. 2d 559 (Fla.1992); Reeves v. State, 612 So. 2d 560 (Fla.1992).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1978)
- Michael André Funchess v. State, 609 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 1992)
- Ross v. State, 601 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1992)
- Reeves v. State, 612 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 1992)
- Becker v. State, 612 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 1992)