RICHARD BYRD, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD SNYDER, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1993-03-03
No. 92-02196
DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.
613 So. 2d 944 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Richard Byrd, Sr. appeals the trial court’s order granting the defendant Richard Snyder’s motion for summary judgment. A motion for summary judgment may only be granted if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that no genuine issue of any material fact remains and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c); See Maybin v. Thompson, 514 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We hold the record reveals genuine issues of fact which preclude summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Clark v. Gochenaur, 623 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
    …ings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that no genuine issue of any material fact remains and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Byrd v. Snyder, 613 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Fla.R.Civ P. 1.510(c). “[A] motion for summary judgment requires the court to view every possible inference in a light most favorable to the non-moving party,” Department of Environmental Regulation v. C.P. Developers, Inc., 512…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw