DONALD RHUE HEIDBREDER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
DONALD RHUE HEIDBREDER, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
613 So. 2d 1322
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Heidbreder v. State, 603 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), based on certified conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), disapproved, Hayles v. State, 608 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. On the authority of Hayles, the decision below is approved. We will not address the issue lying beyond the scope of conflict jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Diosdado Diaz and Dennis Haber, Esq. v. Rina Cohan Diaz & Leinoff & Silvers, P.A., 826 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2002)…ne to address the merits of the award of fees against the former husband because it is not the basis for this Court’s conflict jurisdiction. See Florida Power & Light Co. v. City of Dania, 761 So. 2d 1089, 1094 n. 11 (Fla.2000); Heidbreder v. State, 613 So. 2d 1322, 1323 (Fla.1993). . We note that neither the trial court nor the Third District based its award of attorneys' fees against Haber on section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1997), which allows for attorneys' fees against an attorney and a client in equal…
-
State v. Castillo, 877 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 2004)…ffirmed Castillo's conviction for official misconduct. Castillo asks us to quash that part of the opinion. Because determination of this issue is not integral to the conflict issue presented for review, we do not address it. See Heidbreder v. State, 613 So. 2d 1322, 1323 (Fla.1993) (declining to address the issue lying beyond the scope of conflict jurisdiction). . "Quid pro quo” means "[a] thing that is exchanged for another thing of more or less equal value; a substitute.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1261 (7th ed…
Authorities Cited
- Saud Tarawneh v. State, 588 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Hayles v. State, 608 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1992)
- Heidbreder v. State, 603 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Marriott Hotel v. Ofelia Maria Restrepo & Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co., 603 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)