DERRICK ACKERS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
DERRICK ACKERS, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
614 So. 2d 494
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted State v. Ackers, 599 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on apparent conflict with McPhadder v. State, 475 So. 2d 1215 (Fla.1985). Upon further review we find these two cases factually distinguishable. Accordingly, jurisdiction was improvidently granted, and this cause is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodriguez v. State, 990 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…nied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959); Young v. State, 601 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), rev’d on other grounds, Lewis v. State, 623 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); State v. Ackers, 599 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), rev. denied, 614 So. 2d 494 (Fla.1993).…
Authorities Cited
- McPHADDER v. State, 475 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 1985)
- State v. Ackers, 599 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)