TIM BIRGE AND MARGARET BIRGE, APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF EAGLE LAKE, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1993-01-27
No. 92-02109
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.
614 So. 2d 550 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Birges appealed a summary judgment in favor of the City of Eagle Lake after sewage backed up into their home due to a lightning strike that disabled the city's sewage pumping station. The court affirmed, holding that the city's failure to install a lightning-immune warning system for its sewer infrastructure constituted a non-actionable planning-level decision protected by governmental immunity.


Holding

The city is not liable for its failure to install a warning system for the sewage system that would be immune to power failure because this constitutes a non-actionable planning-level decision regarding capital improvements. A governmental entity is protected by immunity from liability for its failure to build, expand, or modernize a capital improvement.


Headnotes

[1] A governmental entity is not liable for its failure to build, expand, or modernize a capital improvement.

[2] Decisions regarding traffic control methods and the failure to upgrade intersections with traffic control devices are judgmental, planning-level decisions that are not ac…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“a governmental entity is not liable for its failure to build, expand, or modernize a capital improvement”

Establishes the primary legal principle governing the city's immunity from liability in this case.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Lightning struck a transformer powering the City of Eagle Lake's sewage pumping station, causing a power failure. This failure resulted in sewage back…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
HALL, Judge.

HALL, Judge.

We affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of the City of Eagle Lake in the Birges’ action against it for damages they incurred when lightning struck the transformer that powered the city’s sewage pumping station and sewage backed up into the Birges’ home. We agree with the trial court that the gist of the Birges’ allegations of liability against the city is that the city failed to install a warning system for its sewer system that would be immune to a power failure. While we certainly sympathize with the Birges’ predicament, we are constrained by the supreme court’s clear pronouncement that a governmental entity is not liable for its failure to build, expand, or modernize a capital improvement. Trianon Park Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 468 So. 2d 912 (Fla.1985).

We find this case analogous to Department of Transportation v. Konney, 587 So. 2d 1292 (Fla.1991), a wrongful death action in which the deceased was killed in an accident at an intersection at which twelve accidents had occurred during the previous four years. The supreme court stated the issue to be” whether the installation of a flashing beacon at the intersection was a planning-level decision required to upgrade the intersection because of increased traffic or an operational-level decision required to warn motorists of a dangerous condition known at the time the intersection was built. The court held that the decision was a nonactionable, planning-level one because of the established “principle that traffic control methods and the failure to upgrade intersections with traffic control devices are judgmental, planning-level decisions, which are not actionable.” Id. at 1295. The judicial branch is no more authorized to determine the type of warning system to be used with a sewer system than it is to determine the type of traffic control devices to be used at intersections. Id.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw