H. PAUL HETT, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL HENNESSEY AND JOHNS EASTERN CO., INC., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
H. Paul Hett appeals the trial court’s final order and judgment of dismissal granting appellees’ motion to quash service of process. The order was entered because Hett, the plaintiff, had not served initial process upon either defendant within 120 days. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.070(j).
We strike from the final order and judgment of dismissal the sentence, “ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff take nothing by his action and Defendants go hence without day.” Rule 1.070(j) states that where an action is dismissed for failure to timely serve the initial process and initial pleading, “the action shall be dismissed without prejudice.” Otherwise, the final order and judgment of dismissal is affirmed.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chambers v. State, 880 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)); Lewellen v. State, 682 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (holding instruction on petit theft was not fundamental error because it was lesser in degree and punishment than grand theft of a motor vehicle); Pointec v. State, 614 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (holding instruction on simple criminal trespass not fundamental [*700] error in prosecution for felony trespass because defense counsel relied on simple trespass during closing argument); Roberts v. State, 461 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1…
-
L.K.B. v. State, 697 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…require the detention of [*198] L.K.B. for the notice to be given. It could have been posted or Robillard or the officer could have told L.K.B. to leave and not come back to the store, and that if he returned, he could be arrested. Pointec v. State, 614 So. 2d 570, 573 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). There is no statutory requirement that L.K.B. produce identification. The statute only requires that L.K.B. receive actual communication. L.D.L. v. State, 569 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Because the officer lacked gro…
-
Higgs v. State, 139 So. 3d 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…in the offense charged, “legal posting” was not proved here, and the information made no reference to the other different and distinct elements of proof of simple trespass, namely actual communication, fencing, or cultivation. See Pointec v. State, 614 So. 2d 570, 573 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (explaining simple trespass is not a lesser included offense of felony trespass when different and distinct elements of proof for simple trespass are not mentioned or referenced in the information). Accordingly, we reverse H…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence