LARRY WATSON GOOSBY, APPELLANT,
v.
ERLA MARIE GOOSBY, APPELLEE
LARRY WATSON GOOSBY, APPELLANT,
ERLA MARIE GOOSBY, APPELLEE
614 So. 2d 692
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Larry Goosby, challenges - a final judgment of dissolution of marriage on two grounds. We find no error in the trial judge not appointing counsel to represent Goosby, and we affirm on that point. We do find, however, that the final order by the trial judge is devoid of certain findings necessary to facilitate meaningful appellate review or to comply with specific statutory requirements concerning equitable distribution. See § 61.075(3), Fla.Stat. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court to make further findings related to distribution of assets including pension benefits. See Walsh v. Walsh, 600 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McMULLAN v. McMULLAN, 710 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…the type of findings necessary for meaningful appellate review. See Holmes v. Holmes, 709 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Romano v. Romano, 690 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Brooks v. Brooks, 678 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Goosby v. Goosby, 614 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We also note that an order which is not clear and definite is insufficient to support enforcement or contempt proceedings. Escribano v. Coviello, 698 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Thompson v. Plowmaker, 681 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 2d…
Authorities Cited
- Walsh v. Walsh, 600 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)