AMY HABIE, PETITIONER,
v.
JOSEPH HABIE, A/K/A JOSE HABIE, A/K/A JOEY HABIE, A/K/A JOSE HABIE NIGRIN, RESPONDENT
AMY HABIE, PETITIONER,
JOSEPH HABIE, A/K/A JOSE HABIE, A/K/A JOEY HABIE, A/K/A JOSE HABIE NIGRIN, RESPONDENT
614 So. 2d 1116
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
GUNTHER, Judge.
Although we deny the petition for writ of certiorari on the grounds of mootness, we note the peculiar circumstances of this case and acknowledge that they may form the basis of proper issues on plenary appeal. In particular, the guardian ad litem’s ex parte application to the trial court for appointment of his own brother, a psychologist residing in Pennsylvania, to assist in evaluating the living situation of the children located in Guatemala, and the petitioner’s contention that the ex parte application was made after the guardian and his brother had completed their evaluation of the children, if true, are questionable events which may give rise to reversible error. DENIED.
ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Miami v. Paredes, 614 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. In this workers’ compensation case, all of the issues raised on appeal have been addressed recently in City of Miami v. Hickey, 614 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), which decision is controlling here. Accordingly, as in Hickey, on the issues of re-troactivity and penalties, we affirm the decision of the judge of compensation claims and certify to the supreme court the following question, wh…