STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DAVID MARKS AND LAURA HAND, APPELLEES
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
DAVID MARKS AND LAURA HAND, APPELLEES
614 So. 2d 1220
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We accept jurisdiction of this appeal under rule 9.160, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, from an order certified by the County Court for Broward County to be of great public importance. On our own motion we in turn certify to the Supreme Court of Florida that the judgment of the County Court, in this case requires immediate resolution by the Supreme Court because the issues presented are of great public importance and have an effect on the administration of justice throughout the state.
APPEAL CERTIFIED TO SUPREME COURT UNDER RULE 9.125.
STONE, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Palag v. State, 622 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…of community control requiring appellant to maintain a daily log containing an hourly accounting of her activities was not pronounced orally at sentencing, and is not authorized by statute. Therefore, this condition must be stricken. Black v. State, 614 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Vinyard v. State, 586 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). See also Nichols v. State, 528 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The parties recognize that the provisions of section 775.089(l)(a), Florida Statutes, place a defendant on cons…