HENRY ROBALEWSKI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1993-03-05
No. 92-1727
DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
615 So. 2d 218 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A 22-month sentence for a felony offense committed after October 1, 1988, where the presumptive sentence is a non-state prison sanction, is not subject to appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant pled nolo contendere to grand theft, an offense committed on November 13, 1991. The presumptive sentence was a non-state prison sanction, bu…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
DIAMANTIS, Judge.

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Appellant appeals his sentence. We conclude that dismissal is required because the sentence is not subject to appeal.

Appellant pled nolo contendere to the charge of grand theft.1 Appellant committed this offense on or about November 13, 1991. Although the applicable guidelines scoresheet provides for a presumptive sentence of any nonstate prison sanction, the trial court sentenced appellant to a term of 22 months imprisonment without giving any written reasons.

Appellant contends that the 22-month sentence constitutes a departure sentence, and that the trial court erred in imposing such a sentence without the requisite contemporaneous written reasons. However, appellant’s contention overlooks section 921.001(5) of the Florida Statutes (1991) which provides in pertinent part:

[A]ny person sentenced for a felony offense committed after October 1, 1988, whose presumptive sentence is any non-state prison sanction may be sentenced to community control or to a term of incarceration not to exceed 22 months. Such sentence is not subject to appeal. [Emphasis added].

Because appellant committed the subject offense after October 1, 1988, the 22-month sentence is both proper and not appealable. Compare Isreal v. State, 573 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (defendant committed offenses prior to October 1, 1988).

Appeal DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. . § 812.014(l)(4)(c), Fla.Stat. (1991).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw