STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER/APPELLANT,
v.
EMANUEL PRIDE, RESPONDENT/APPELLEE

Fla. | 1993-01-21
No. 80277
BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
616 So. 2d 6 Florida Supreme Court (1993) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Justice.

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review Pride v. State, 603 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1993).1 In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we approve the decision of the district court in the instant case.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. . We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), (3)-(4), Fla. Const.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kirby v. State, 625 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
    …felony offender provision (§ 775.084(l)(a)) they drafted the statute to apply where “defendant has previously been convicted of two or more felonies in this state....” The decision in Pride v. State, 603 So. 2d 24, 26 (Fla. 1st DCA1992), approved, 616 So. 2d 6 (Fla.1993), applies to the regular habitual offender classification. Under Pride, the adjudication as a regular habitual offender depends on the felonies having been committed in Florida. However, this defendant was not convicted under that section…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw