ERIC A. RANDALL, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, V. ERIC A. RANDALL, APPELLEE
ERIC A. RANDALL, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, V. ERIC A. RANDALL, APPELLEE
616 So. 2d 20
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Justice.
We have for review Randall v. State, 601 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1993).1 In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we approve the decision of the district court in the instant case. We note that none of the remaining issues raised by Randall were discussed by the district court and we decline to address those issues in this opinion.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. . We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), (4), Fla. Const.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Johnson, 616 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1993)
- Randall v. State, 601 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Venzal v. State, 601 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)