STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES TOMMY PEEK, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
JAMES TOMMY PEEK, RESPONDENT
616 So. 2d 50
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Peek v. State, 610 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the district court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Peek and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker. It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rigmaiden v. Nbcuniversal Media, LLC, 307 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Woodard v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 616 So. 2d 50, 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (recognizing: “The news media has been given a qualified privilege to accurately report on the information they receive from government officials. This privilege includes the broadcast ‘of the contents of an official documen…
-
Peek v. State, 619 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…al offender sentences when the trial court failed to make the specific findings required by the habitual offender statute, but we certified the question, see Peek v. State, 610 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In State of Florida v. James Tommy Peek, 616 So. 2d 50 (Fla.1993), the supreme court quashed our opinion and remanded for proceedings consistent with State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460, 462 (Fla.1993), in which it held that when the state introduces unrebutted evidence of the defendant’s prior convictions,…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1993)
- Peek v. State, 610 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)