ALPHONSE ADDONISIO, APPELLANT,

v.

THE DIAL CORP. AND FLORIDA SUPERMARKETS, INC., D/B/A SUN SUPERMARKETS & PANTRY PRIDE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Preston v. State, 641 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …der, the sentence was in reality within the permitted range and no departure order was necessary. As the sentence is within the sentencing guidelines, it is not subject to appellate review. See § 921.001(5), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992); Gonzalez v. State, 616 So. 2d 71, 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Panek v. State, 593 So. 2d 307, 307-08 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Reversed and remanded for a new trial. . State v. Neil, 457 So. 2d 481 (Fla.1984). . The trial occurred in November, 1993. . Johans eliminated the requirement for…
• Jamale Reaves v. State, 655 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …the court took into account conduct of which defendant had been acquitted. This court has held that a sentence falling within the sentencing guidelines is not reviewable. Preston v. State, 641 So. 2d 169, 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Gonzalez v. State, 616 So. 2d 71, 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Panek v. State, 593 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); see also §§ 921.001(5), 924.06(l)(e), Fla.Stat. (1993). Defendant asserts that his position is supported by Reese v. State, 639 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We disagree.…

Authorities Cited

• Lasar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Bachanov, 436 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
• Chrysler Corp. v. Wolmer, 499 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1986)
• Gencorp, Inc. v. Wolfe, 481 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
• Voynar v. Butler Mfg. Co., 463 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)