ROBERT SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that secret, unauthorized tape recordings of conversations in a police vehicle violate the right of privacy and statutory provisions, rendering the recording and derived evidence inadmissible.
Appellant, not under arrest or suspicion, was asked to sit in a police vehicle for safety. While there, police secretly recorded his conversation with…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Admissibility Of Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere to the charge of trafficking in cocaine. He expressly reserved his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence and a secret tape recording of his conversation in the back seat of a police vehicle. We reverse and remand.
Appellant contends the trial court erred when it failed to suppress the tape recording. We agree. The police asked appellant to sit in the rear of a police vehicle solely for safety and comfort reasons. At that time, appellant was neither under arrest nor under articulable suspicion. Without appellant’s consent or other authorization, the police recorded his conversation. In Springle v. State, 613 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), this court held such secret and unauthorized tape recordings constitute an invasion of the right of privacy and a violation of section 934.03, Florida Statutes (1991). Therefore, the contents of the tape recording and any evidence derived therefrom are inadmissible under section 934.06, Florida Statutes (1991).
Appellant has not demonstrated reversible error in his arguments that the police conducted a purely pretextual traffic stop and illegally detained him in the police vehicle. The record shows the illegal tape recording did not assist the police m their discovery of the suspected cocaine. Therefore, the trial court did not err when it denied appellant’s motion to suppress as to the seized physical evidence.
Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence and remand for further consistent proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Springle v. State, 613 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
- Anson Inc. v. Janet E. Deutsch f/n/a Janet E. Boyd, 613 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)