THE CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, APPELLANT,
v.
GARY L. ASHLEY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The City of Daytona Beach appeals an award of attorney's fees in a workers' compensation case, arguing that the judge of compensation claims failed to comply with statutory requirements by not specifying the amount of benefits obtained, the statutory basis, and the type of benefits secured. The court reverses and remands because the fee award lacks the required findings.
A judge of compensation claims must list the amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation in all attorney's fee awards. The fee award must be based on an initial determination of benefits secured, followed by consideration of statutory factors to determine whether to deviate from the guideline fee. The order here was deficient for failing to make findings about the benefits obtained.
[1] An order awarding attorney's fees must specify the amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation.
[2] The judge of compensation claims must determine the amount of benefits obtained as a result of an attorney's efforts before awarding fees.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In awarding a reasonable attorney's fee, the judge of compensation claims shall consider only those benefits to the claimant that the attorney is responsible for securing. The amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation shall be listed on all attorney's fees awarded by the judge of compensation claims.”
This is the controlling statutory requirement that the lower court failed to meet, establishing that specific findings are mandatory.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe City of Daytona Beach, a self-insured employer, was ordered to pay $49,500 in attorney's fees to the claimant's attorney in a workers' compensatio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney'S Fees In Workers' Compensation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The City of Daytona Beach, the self-insured employer, appeals a final order of the judge of compensation claims which granted fees to claimant’s attorney. The City argues that the order of the judge of compensation claims is deficient for not specifying the amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation. We reverse.
Section 440.34(2), Florida Statutes, provides:
In awarding a reasonable attorney’s fee, the judge of compensation claims shall consider only those benefits to the claimant that the attorney is responsible for securing. The amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation shall be listed on all attorney’s fees awarded by the judge of compensation claims. For purposes of this section, the term “benefits secured” means benefits obtained as a result of the claimant’s attorney’s legal services rendered in connection with the claim for benefits.1
After determining the benefits obtained, the judge of compensation claims must then consider all the statutory factors in determining whether to increase or decrease the guideline fee. Sec. 440.34(1), Fla.Stat. See Barco Vending Co. v. Villalonga, 608 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
The judge of compensation claims issued an order which, in pertinent part, provided:
After reviewing the Affidavits submitted, hearing argument of counsel, reviewing the file and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, I find that a reasonable fee for Claimant’s attorney for representation of the Claimant in obtaining benefits is $49,500.00.
The order never made a finding concerning the amount of benefits which were actually obtained by claimant’s attorney. It is not possible to determine whether the judge of compensation claims awarded, or departed from, the statutory fee. The order of the judge of compensation claims is reversed. The case is remanded for the judge of compensation claims to determine the amount of benefits obtained as a result of the efforts of the attorney, and to determine whether, based upon specific findings regarding the factors in section 440.34(l)(a)-(h), a deviation from the statutory fee schedule is justified.
ERVIN, BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. . The 1989 amendment to section 440.34(2), Florida Statutes, which provides that the "amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation shall be listed on all attorney's fees awarded,” is procedural in nature and applies to an award of attorney’s fees in cases in which the accident preceded the amendment. Cf. Volusia Memorial Park v. White, 549 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Volusia Mem'l Park & Nationwide Ins. Co. v. White, 549 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
- Barco Vending Co. & Am. Policyholders v. Villalonga, 608 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)