JOHN DENMARK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida First District Court of Appeal granted the Public Defender for the Second Judicial Circuit's motion to withdraw from representing the appellant Denmark and 50 other appellants in direct appeals, finding that underfunding had created unmanageable caseloads preventing effective assistance of appellate counsel. The court temporarily appointed alternate counsel and remanded to the circuit court for appointment of a special public defender to ensure the appellants' constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel.
The motion to withdraw was granted. The court relinquished jurisdiction to the circuit court for 30 days to appoint a special public defender. The Public Defender for the Eighth Circuit was temporarily appointed as appellate counsel, and the time for service of the initial brief was extended to 30 days from the order appointing the special public defender.
[1] A public defender may be permitted to withdraw as appellate counsel when the office lacks sufficient staff to timely brief assigned cases due to an excessive caseload.
[2] When a public defender is permitted to withdraw due to understaffing, jurisdiction may be relinquished to the circuit court for the appointment of a special public defend…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the appellate attorneys in the office, despite diligent efforts where they meet or exceed all recognized workload levels, are unable to prevent creation of a backlog of cases. This causes an ever-increasing delay in the filing of initial briefs and such delays raise questions as to whether the appellants are being afforded their constitutionally guaranteed right to effective assistance of counsel on appeal.”
Establishes the systemic underfunding problem that justified granting the withdrawal motion based on constitutional concerns about effective assistance of counsel.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Public Defender for the Second Judicial Circuit moved to withdraw as appellate counsel for Denmark and fifty other appellants in direct appeals fr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
ORDER ON COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW
PER CURIAM.
The Public Defender for the Second Judicial Circuit, who represents the appellant in this direct appeal from a judgment and sentence, moves to withdraw as counsel in this case and fifty others. Movant avers that the office continues to be underfunded for the number of cases assigned. As a result, the appellate attorneys in the office, despite diligent efforts where they meet or exceed all recognized workload levels, are unable to prevent creation of a backlog of cases. This causes an ever-increasing delay in the filing of initial briefs and such delays raise questions as to whether the appellants are being afforded their constitutionally guaranteed right to effective assistance of counsel on appeal.
We have granted similar relief to the Public Defender in similar circumstances in the past, see, e.g., Bennett v. State, 605 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Woods v. State, 595 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), and cases cited therein. There is no apparent reason to deny relief at this time and the motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant in this cause is granted. Jurisdiction is relinquished to the circuit court for 30 days for appointment of a special public defender. The Public Defender for the Eighth Circuit is temporarily appointed to represent appellant in that forum during that time. Temporary counsel shall ensure the matter is timely brought before the trial court and the clerk of the circuit court shall bring this order to the attention of the Chief Circuit Judge. The circuit court clerk is also directed to provide this court, the Public Defender for the Second Circuit, and the appellant, at his last known address, with copies of the order of appointment of a special public defender. In the event such an appointment is not made, temporary counsel shall file a written report within 45 days of this date explaining the lack of an appointment.
Time for service of the initial brief is extended to 30 days from date of the order appointing the special public defender. Similar relief will be granted in the remaining 50 cases by unpublished orders.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Woods v. State, 595 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- KEY v. State, 605 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Bennett v. State, 605 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)