RUTH ANN GARDNER, APPELLANT,
v.
SABAL POINT PROPERTIES, INC., A DISSOLVED CORPORATION, AND SABAL POINT COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 1993-04-09
No. 92-1789
W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
616 So. 2d 1111 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Summary judgment is inappropriate when the movant fails to demonstrate the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sued appellee for negligence, alleging a palm tree planted by appellee obstructed a stop sign, contributing to an accident. The only evidenc…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
DIAMANTIS, Judge.

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Ruth Ann Gardner appeals the final order of summary judgment entered in this negligence action. We reverse.

A movant for summary judgment has the initial burden of demonstrating the nonexistence of any genuine issue of fact. Landers v. Milton, 370 So. 2d 368 (Fla.1979). Summary judgment is inappropriate unless the facts of the case are so crystallized that disposition of questions of law are all that remain for the trial court to determine. 4444 Corp. v. City of Orlando, 598 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Daniell, 591 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), rev. denied, 599 So. 2d 1278 (Fla.1992).

The only evidence in this case is appellant's answer to an interrogatory propounded by appellee which states that a second defendant was speeding and went through a stop sign, damaging appellant’s car beyond repair and injuring appellant. This answer does not negate the claim of negligence made against appellee to the effect that appellee planted a palm tree on its property or in the right-of-way and allowed the palm tree to grow so as to obstruct the stop sign.

REVERSED.

W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nard, Inc. v. DeVITO Contracting & Supply, Inc., 769 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
    …Memphis Group, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc., 732 So. 2d 1092 (Fla.App. 1st DCA 1999); Romero v. All Claims Insurance Repairs, Inc., 698 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Gardner v. Sabal Point Properties, Inc., 616 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).3 In Metropolitan Dade County v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 683 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), the Third District reminded the trial court that “it is obligated to follow established law.” (Emphasis in ori…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw