JOSE DANILO CRUZ AND RICHARD MANUEL MILIAN, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSE DANILO CRUZ AND RICHARD MANUEL MILIAN, APPELLANTS,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
617 So. 2d 454
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We vacate defendants’ sentences because the court imposed sentences in excess of the statutory maximum for second degree misdemeanors. Shaktman v. State, 529 So. 2d 711, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 553 So. 2d 148 (Fla.1989); § 775.-082(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).
Defendants’ remaining point lacks merit. William v. State, 591 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Flanagan v. State, 536 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Shaktman v. State, 553 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1989)
- Clarkson v. U.S. Home Corp. & Epic Assocs. 81-Liii, 529 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
- Flanagan v. State, 536 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
- Williams v. State, 591 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)