STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
HAROLD LINFORD GREEN, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Entrapment By Estoppel cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to dismiss the information charging him with solicitation to deliver cocaine. The trial court dismissed on the authority of Kelly v. State, 593 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 599 So. 2d 1280 (Fla.1992) and Grissett v. State, 594 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA), dismissed, 599 So. 2d 1280 (Fla.1992). The trial court found the police had manufactured the crack cocaine used in this transaction and that its use constituted an integral part of the transaction whether charged as purchase of cocaine or solicitation to purchase cocaine.
We reverse. In Metcalf v. State, 614 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), this court expressly rejected the reasons relied upon by the trial court in its order of dismissal. We also find no merit in appellee’s argument that the dismissal should be) upheld on grounds of double jeopardy.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DELL, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Montague, 682 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1996)…So. 2d 508 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We accepted jurisdiction to answer the following question certified to be of great public importance: HAS PINACLE v. STATE [Pinacle v. State], 654 So. 2d 908 (Fla.1995), OVERRULED LINKOUS v. STATE [Linkous v. State], 618 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2D DCA), REVIEW DENIED, 626 So. 2d 208 (Fla.1993), AND ADOPTED THE HOLDING OF PERRYMAN v. STATE [Perryman v. State], 608 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1ST DCA 1992), REVIEW DENIED, 621 So. 2d 432 (Fla.1993), SO THAT IN ORDER TO PRESERVE A KARCHESKY SENTENC…1 / 2
-
Singleton v. State, 620 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)…ontention that Singleton’s attack upon the trial court’s assessment of victim injury points is barred for lack of contemporaneous objection. We have rejected that view in Morris v. State, 605 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); see also Linkous v. State, 618 So. 2d 294 18 Fla.L.Weekly D1074 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (noted conflict with Perryman). Second, the state argues that the amendment to section 921.001, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992),1 mandates affirmance because it went into effect on April 8, 1992 — the date of S…
-
Royce Glenn Harper v. State, 632 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…at the victim injury points were assessed for “[cjontact but no penetration,” we agree with appellant that the points were improperly included and therefore reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with Karchesky. See also Linkous v. State, 618 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA) (reversing summary denial of 3.800(a) motion relying on Karchesky), review denied, 626 So. 2d 208 (Fla.1993); Morris v. State, 605 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (concluding that Karchesky error is readily ascertainable from the face of…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kelly v. State, 593 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
- Arnett LEE, Sr. v. Gray CAB Co., 614 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
- Grissett v. State, 594 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)