JOYCE M. WALLACE, APPELLANT,
v.
ZAHN DENTAL COMPANY, INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
JOYCE M. WALLACE, APPELLANT,
ZAHN DENTAL COMPANY, INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
618 So. 2d 382
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Joyce M. Wallace appeals the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee’s findings, the order is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
DeJESUS v. Riconed, Inc., 741 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d…
-
Mainor Chacon v. Joell Designers Corp., 17 So. 3d 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the appeals referee to resolve the conflicts in testimony, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d…
-
Briceno v. Precision Delivery Sys., Inc., 752 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gerald v. State, 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Osmundo R. Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)