BRUCE ANGLIN, APPELLANT,
v.
DIANE ANGLIN, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Bruce Anglin appeals an order denying his motion for downward modification in his alimony obligation. As did the trial court and the general master, we assume but do not decide that the alimony amount set forth in the parties’ property settlement agreement was subject to modification. However, on the merits we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to modify. The former wife’s need for the alimony is undisputed. The amount is one which the trier of fact could reasonably find the husband has the ability to pay. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
The order under review is therefore
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
DeJESUS v. Riconed, Inc., 741 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d…
-
Mainor Chacon v. Joell Designers Corp., 17 So. 3d 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the appeals referee to resolve the conflicts in testimony, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d…
-
Briceno v. Precision Delivery Sys., Inc., 752 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)