C.J., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
C.J., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
618 So. 2d 796
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order and amended order of adjudication and disposition in this case do not contain a time limit for the commitment of appellant to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. We remand for amendment of the disposition order in this regard consistent with section 39.054(4), Florida Statutes (1989).
Otherwise affirmed.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bell v. State, 652 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…o. 2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Pellot v. State, 582 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 591 So. 2d 183 (Fla.1991). The costs of prosecution assessed against Appellant should not have included $528.00 attorney’s fees to the state. Hill v. State, 618 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Smith v. State, 606 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), rev. denied, 618 So. 2d 211 (Fla.1993). The special condition of probation (that Appellant receive a substance abuse evaluation and treatment and bear the cost of same) is inva…
-
Williamson v. State, 658 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…week until gainfully-employed. The order of probation requires the appellant to pay $2,500 “cost of prosecution.” The appellant asserts that this amount represents attorney’s fees for the prosecutor’s services, which is improper. In Hill v. State, 618 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), this court stated that attorney’s fees are not a part of costs of prosecution. The state agrees with that proposition, but claims'that only $1,351 represented attorney’s fees and that the remainder of the award was for what the t…