STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
NADINE NEVADOMSKI, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reversed the suppression order and remanded the case for further proceedings.
The case involved the State's use of breath-testing machine results in a criminal trial. The trial court had suppressed these results.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Void For Vagueness Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur. ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
In State v. Rochelle, 609 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), dismissed sub nom. Comrey v. State, 617 So. 2d 318 (1993), we certified four questions as being of great public importance. The supreme court’s order of dismissal said:
Petitioner’s Unopposed Petition to File Belated Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction is denied and the above styled case is hereby dismissed.
Given the possibility that the lateness of the application in our state’s highest court may have been the reason that the court declined to review the above case and the questions presented therein, we grant the motion to certify the same questions; namely:
A. ARE RULES 10-D42.023 AND 10D-42.024, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, AS THEY EXISTED PRIOR TO AUGUST 1, 1991, VOID FOR VAGUENESS?
B. IF SO, DOES THIS PRECLUDE THE STATE’S USE OF TEST RESULTS OBTAINED ON BREATH-TESTING MACHINES MAINTAINED PURSUANT TO THOSE RULES IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL?
C. IS THE USE OF DIFFERENT (NOT UNIFORM) FORMS, REFLECTING DIFFERENT MONTHLY MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES FOR BREATH-TESTING EQUIPMENT, A DENIAL OF EQUAL PROTECTION?
D. IF SO, DOES THIS PRECLUDE THE STATE’S USE OF TEST RESULTS FROM THE BREATH-TESTING INSTRUMENTS SO TESTED IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL?
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur. HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Carino v. State, 635 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1994)…, DOES THIS PRECLUDE THE STATE’S USE OF TEST RESULTS FROM THE BREATH-TESTING INSTRUMENTS SO TESTED IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL? State v. Carino, 625 So. 2d 1215, 1215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (incorporating questions previously certified in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So. 2d 310, 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) and State v. Rochelle, 609 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review dismissed sub nom., Comrey v. State, 617 So. 2d 318 (Fla.1993)). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Initially, we disagree with the State’s…
-
State v. Taylor, 619 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…v. Rochelle, 609 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur. ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur. HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.…
-
State v. Carino, 625 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…te v. Rochelle, 609 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur. ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur. HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Sydney Rochelle, 609 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)