MIZELL LIVE STOCK COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
R. P. HENDRY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1916-01-05
70 Fla. 595 Florida Supreme Court (1916)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment, finding no errors in the proceedings. The court's per curiam opinion indicates a review of the record and arguments led to the decision to uphold the Circuit Court's ruling.


Holding

The Florida Supreme Court held that there were no errors in the Circuit Court's judgment.


Key Quotes

“it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment”

This quote directly states the court's finding regarding the lower court's judgment.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Mizell Live Stock Company, a Corporation, appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court. The case was submitted on a transcript of the record and argumen…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of, its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed; it is further ordered by the court that the defendant in error do have and recover of and from the plaintiff in error his costs by him in this behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of $........ ......, all of which is ordered to be certified to the court below.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw