T.O.M., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hassen, 650 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …because, under the law, “if one who sustains loss as a result of negligence or wrongdoing of another releases the tortfeasor, an insurer subrogated to the right of the injured party is barred by that release.” High v. General American Life Ins. Co., 619 So. 2d 459, 461 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 629 So. 2d 133 (Fla.1993). Significantly, the provisions of the contract, just like the 1989 statute, imposed no prepayment obligation on State Farm in order to preserve its right of recovery against a tortfeasor.…
• Lincoln Nat'l Health & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales OF Am., Inc., 666 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …with the remaining tortfeasors. Assuming that Florida law applies to this action, defendants next urge that the release in their favor signed by Skowronek bars Lincoln’s subrogation claim.3 Defendants rely on High v. General American Life Ins. Co., 619 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 629 So. 2d 133 (Fla.1993), which was an action for subrogation brought by a health insurer against two third-party tort-feasors to recover medical benefits the insurer had paid to its insured. The tortfeasors asserted…
• Safecare Med. Ctr. v. Donald C. Howard, D.O., 670 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …iminated in 1991, during the first appeal to this court. AFFIRMED. GUNTHER, C.J., and STONE, J., concur. . At ora' argument, counsel for appellant conceded that dismissal of the subrogation count was proper. See High v. General Am. Life Ins. Co., 619 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).…