ARTHUR RESNICK, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
COUNTY LINE AUTO CENTER, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
ARTHUR RESNICK, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
COUNTY LINE AUTO CENTER, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
619 So. 2d 510
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. ' Aventura Mall Venture v. Olson, 561 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 574 So. 2d 142 (Fla.1990).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Resnick v. Cnty. Line Auto Ctr., Inc., 639 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…that the negligent design had caused him to suffer permanent injuries. The trial court denied County Line’s motion to dismiss, but later granted County Line’s motion for summary judgment. This court affirmed. Resnick v. County Line Auto Center Inc., 619 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). There was no basis in this case for an award of fees pursuant to section 57.105. Although the defendant ultimately prevailed, “we cannot say that the facts demonstrate a total lack of a justiciable issue at the time suit was fi…
Authorities Cited
- Aventura Mall Venture v. Olson, 561 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)