RONALD PROUDFOOT AND KITTY PROUDFOOT, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
SEAESCAPE LIMITED, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE
RONALD PROUDFOOT AND KITTY PROUDFOOT, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
SEAESCAPE LIMITED, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE
620 So. 2d 1096
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The duty to maintain Terminal No. 6 in the Port of Miami does not fall upon Seaes-cape. Metropolitan Dade County owns, cleans, inspects and maintains Terminal No. 6. Moreover, Port of Miami employees inspect, repair, maintain, and clean the terminal. Accordingly, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of Seaescape. See Air Canada v. Smith, 357 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); see generally, Corrales v. Spieler, 588 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- AIR Canada v. Smith, 357 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
- Celso Corrales v. Spieler, 588 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)