MICHAEL DRAGER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL DRAGER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
620 So. 2d 1107
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Drager’s motion to withdraw his plea, but our affirmance is without prejudice to Drager’s right to raise this issue pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
FRANK, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lockett v. Lockett, 235 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…court order to comply with discovery is necessary to sustain the severe sanctions of dismissal or default against a noncomplying plaintiff or- defendant.”); cfi Patton v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., Office of Child Support Enft ex rel. D.A.R., 620 So. 2d 1107, 1109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (“The-failure to include specific reasons for the imposition of sanctions, though reversible error if attacked on plenary appeal, does not' render a judgment ’void’ as that term is used in ... rule 1.540.”). However, “no ’ma…
-
Pathman v. Est. OF Margaret Preusse, 782 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Patton v. State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement ex rel. D.A.R., 620 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).…