JOSEPH INNES, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
JOSEPH INNES, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
620 So. 2d 1233
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Opinion of the Court
[*1234] PER CURIAM.
We have for review Innes v. State, 597 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the district court asserted conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We addressed the issue in this case in Sirmons v. State, 620 So. 2d 1249 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with Sirmons.
It is so ordered.
overton, McDonald, shaw, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.
Concurrence
BARKETT, Chief Justice,
specially concurring.
I concur, but with the same reservations I expressed in Sirmons v. State, 620 So. 2d 1249 (Fla.1993).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Sirmons v. State, 620 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 1993)
- Lang v. State, 566 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
- Woods v. State, 597 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
- Innes v. State, 597 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)