SHERYL DYKSTRA-GULICK, PETITIONER,

v.

DOUGLAS GULICK, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (65 total)

• State v. Schopp, 653 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1995)
  …d without a change in the circumstances that justified its adoption. The only circumstance that has changed since the Court issued its decision in Smith is the membership of the Court. As Justice Overton stated in his concurrence in Perez v. State, 620 So. 2d 1256, 1259 (Fla.1993) (Overton, J., concurring), “adhering to precedent is an essential part of our judicial system and philosophy.” Justice Overton also explained that the doctrine of stare decisis requires an examination of “the possible significance…
• Rev. Dr. James Armstrong v. Harris, 773 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 2000)
  …the Court less than a week before the general election) without extensive briefing by the parties. In the years following Grose, the issue has been widely debated and has been the focus of intensive and spirited discourse. See, e.g., Perez v. State, 620 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 1993); Bemie v. State, 524 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 1988). . See § 101.161(1), Fla. Stat. (1997) ("The substance of the amendment or other public measure shall be an explanatory statement, not exceeding 75 words in length, of the chief purpose of the…
• Puryear v. State, 810 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 2002)
  …. This is a judge-made rule created to assist courts in rendering decisions by making the work of judges easier, fostering stability in the law, and promoting public respect for the law as an objective, impersonal set of principles. Perez v. State, 620 So. 2d 1256, 1267 (Fla.1993) (Shaw, J., dissenting); see also State v. Gray, 654 So. 2d 552, 554 (Fla.1995) (“Stare decisis provides stability to the law and to the society governed by that law.”) (citing State v. Schopp, 653 So. 2d 1016 (Fla.1995) (Harding, J.…

Authorities Cited

• Beres Waite v. Waite, 618 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 1993)
• Dykstra-Gulick v. Gulick, 604 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)