JOHN M. CANTY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jenney v. Airdata Wiman, Inc., 846 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
  …o establish his claims). Moreover, attorney-client privilege is not waived simply because the credibility of Jenney’s statements concerning his intent could possibly be impeached by his communications with his former attorney. See Cuillo v. Cuillo, 621 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (holding that the former wife did not waive her attorney-client privilege simply because the credibility of her claim that she relied on her husband’s representations could be impeached by deposing her former attorney). Were this…
• Long v. Murphy, 663 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …ndants at issue, they are entitled to discover all of his communications with his attorneys concerning the subject of this lawsuit. We disagree that Long waived his attorney-client privilege under these circumstances. We think that Cuillo v. Cuillo, 621 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) resolves this issue properly, and that Savino v. Luciano, 92 So. 2d 817 (Fla.1957) is not controlling. In Cuillo, a wife seeking a dissolution of marriage from her husband sought as part of her suit to invalidate an antenuptial…
• Volpe v. Conroy, Simberg & Ganon, P.A., 720 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
  …e client sued the second law firm, who then sought production of all of the communications between the client and the first and third lawyers, claiming that it was vital to the law firm’s defense. Citing to this court’s decision in Cuillo v. Cuillo, 621 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), the Shafnaker court held that the communications were subject to the privilege. See id. at 1111-12. That the privileged communications occurred in the course of a transaction which is later litigated did not eliminate the privil…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1993)