DAVID MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1993-05-26
No. 93-1384
HERSEY and POLEN, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.
621 So. 2d 485 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a new motion in the trial court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which contains a proper oath. Scott v. State, 464 So. 2d 1171 (Fla.1985).

HERSEY and POLEN, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Moore v. The Honorable Stanton S. Kaplan, 640 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
    …t Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. That petition was denied because it was not properly sworn. This court affirmed the denial, but granted petitioner leave to file a properly sworn motion. Moore v. State, 621 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). On June 23, 1993, petitioner filed a second motion for post-conviction relief. The clerk of the court processed the motion and directed it to respondent, The Honorable Stanton S. Kaplan. Having received no ruling on his 3.850…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw