GERALD FYFE, APPELLANT,
v.
MAYA R. HUENINK, A/K/A MAYA HUENINK SUNDERLAND, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1993-07-30
No. 93-1234
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
621 So. 2d 587 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a).

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Blowe v. State, 653 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
    …a) motion that the trial court erroneously calculated the amount of credit he was due for time served. After reviewing the record, we agree. This court reversed appellant’s original sentence because it exceeded the statutory maximum. Blowe v. State, 621 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). When the trial court resentenced appellant, it awarded credit for the time appellant had served in prison while the appeal of the original sentence was pending, but it did not award credit for the time appellant spent in jail pr…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw