DANIEL JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1993-08-11
No. 93-1535
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
621 So. 2d 1096 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that his motion for post-conviction relief contained a facially sufficient claim for relief.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that appellant be granted an evidentiary hearing on his claim or that portions of the record conclusively demonstrating that he is not entitled to relief be attached to any order of denial.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tzippora Kalisch v. Kalisch, 646 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
    …aite decision reveals that the supreme court did not limit its application. Therefore, we hold that Mrs. Kalisch’s action may proceed in accordance with the supreme court’s abrogation of the interspousal immunity doctrine. Accord Sleeter v. Collins, 621 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Accordingly, the order is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw