THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
SANTOS M. GARCIA, OMAR MORGAN, FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, ADELAIN ARAGON, AND MAGDALINE ROBERTS, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the time for filing an appeal begins to run when a signed, written order is filed with the clerk, not when a notation is made on a file jacket or disposition sheet.
[1] An appeal period begins to run from the date a signed, written order is filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal, not from an earlier notation on a file jacket or dispo…
[2] A circuit court's dismissal of an appeal as untimely, based on an incorrect calculation of the appeal period, departs from the essential requirements of law.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCounty court judges dismissed DUI charges, making notations on file jackets or disposition sheets. The State appealed within 15 days of written orders…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Timeliness Of Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This petition is brought to review circuit court orders dismissing appeals from county court orders, which dismiss charges for driving under the influence.
On April 5, 1991, five county court judges issued a consolidated order setting forth the procedure to be followed in cases where a motion to dismiss was filed for failure of the City of Miami Police Department to videotape DUI suspects. After each hearing on a motion to dismiss, a notation was made, either on the disposition sheet in the court file or on the jacket of the file, that the charges had been dismissed. No notice of court action was sent to the parties. Some four to six weeks later, written orders of dismissal were filed with the clerk of the court. Copies were sent to the parties.
The State filed its notice of appeal within fifteen days from the date the written orders were filed with the clerk of the court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(2). The circuit court, appellate division, dismissed the appeals as untimely. Its ruling was that the time for taking an appeal began to run when the notation of dismissal was recorded on the file jacket or on a disposition sheet within the file.
The orders dismissing the appeals as untimely are quashed as departing from the essential requirements of law. All the appeals were taken timely, i.e., within 15 days after the county court rendered its orders. “An order is rendered when a signed, written order is filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(g). No applicable rule of procedure specifically provides to the contrary.
Fox v. District Court of Appeal, Fourth Dist., 553 So. 2d 161 (Fla.1989), is not supportive of the respondents’ arguments. In Fox there were oral pronouncements by the court followed by a signing of the sentencing form. In only two of the five cases here on review were there oral pronouncements in court, and in none of the cases was a written order signed by the trial court.
Certiorari is granted. The orders dismissing the appeals are quashed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Francis, 954 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…p. P. 9.020(f) (defining an “order” as “[a] decision, order, judgment, decree, or rule of a lower tribunal, excluding minutes and minute book entries”). We find the document in this case to be distinguishable from those discussed in State v. Garcia, 622 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (finding that unsigned notation on the “file jacket” was not an “order”), and State v. Tremblay, 642 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (finding that “court status form,” although signed by the judge, was not an “order”). We similarly…
Authorities Cited
- FOX v. Dist. Court OF Appeal, 553 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1989)