MARTIN PINTAR AND ANITA PINTAR, APPELLANTS,
v.
JOSEPH COATES, JOHN KELLY, LAKE WORTH HERALD, JAY KRAVETZ, AND CITY OF LAKE WORTH, APPELLEES
MARTIN PINTAR AND ANITA PINTAR, APPELLANTS,
JOSEPH COATES, JOHN KELLY, LAKE WORTH HERALD, JAY KRAVETZ, AND CITY OF LAKE WORTH, APPELLEES
622 So. 2d 159
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final judgments entered in favor of appellees in all respects except the trial court’s determination that Lake Worth Herald and Jay Kravetz were entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1991), which we reverse.
ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and BIRKEN, ARTHUR M., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Holmes v. Greene, 649 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…4 So. 2d 1034, 1036 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (citing McGregor v. McGregor, 418 So. 2d 1073, 1074 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)). Accord Grumney v. Haber, 641 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Schweinberg v. Click, 627 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Kudick v. Kudick, 622 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Thus, in Zediker, we held that, on appeal in cases such as this, [o]ur task ... is to determine whether the trial court’s discretion is supported in the record by competent and substantial evidence revealing that substantial or…
-
Tucker v. Greenberg, 674 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…at school; their level of self-assurance and their feelings towards their father. This post-dissolution conduct — interfering with visitation coupled with creating emotional problems in the children — was a substantial change. See Kudick v. Kudick, 622 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Tessler v. Tessler, 539 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 549 So. 2d 1014 (Fla.1989). See also § 61.13(4)(c)2., Fla.Stat. (1993). It could be argued that the former wife’s behavior could be corrected by sanctions or by…
-
Newman v. Newman, 657 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…shes the facts as previously outlined. The father concedes, as he must, that he bore an extraordinary burden to show a substantial and material change in the circumstances of the parties since entry of the judgment to be modified. Kudick v. Kudick, 622 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); McGlamry v. McGlamry, 608 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Zediker v. Zediker, 444 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Here the circumstances of the New York decree were that the child lived with the mother through the end of 1992…