MARK KENNETH SACHS, APPELLANT,
v.
HOLLY SACHS, APPELLEE
MARK KENNETH SACHS, APPELLANT,
HOLLY SACHS, APPELLEE
623 So. 2d 640
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The husband appealed a non-final order entered after final judgment granting a continuing writ of garnishment against his salary, pursuant to section 61.12, Florida Statutes (1991), solely for the collection of the former wife’s attorney’s fees. We reverse the order on authority of Reyf v. Reyf, 620 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This holding renders moot appellant’s remaining point.
Remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alvaro Martinez, Jr., M.D. v. GOLISTING.COM, Inc., 233 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…n Sachs v, Sachs, this .Court reversed a trial court’s non-final order entered after' final judgment granting a continuing writ of garnishment against one former spouse’s wages solely for the collection of the other former spouse’s attorney’s- fees. 623 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (per curiam) (reversing the order on authority of Reyf). In conclusion, séctidri 61.12 limits the remedy of a continuing writ of garnishment to alimony or child support in proceedings under Chapter 61. Whether attorney’s fees wer…
Authorities Cited
- Reyf v. Reyf, 620 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)