FIRST AMERICAN EQUITY-RAINBOW PLANTATION, ETC., APPELLANT,

v.

TRANSCAPITAL DEVELOPMENT CORP., ETC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Neal v. State, 688 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
  …wrongs. It does not prohibit reasonable restrictions on the exercise of that right. E.g., Bystrom v. Diaz, 514 So. 2d 1072 (Fla.1987); Snyder v. Douglas, 647 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Department of Revenue v. Nu-Life Health and Fitness Center, 623 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Section 924.051(3) does not deprive one of the right to appeal. It merely re [*396] quires that allegedly prejudicial error be preserved by appropriate and timely action in the trial court. This is not a new concept; nor is it o…
• State v. Ray Constr. of Okaloosa Cnty., 667 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …in the circuit court. The requirements of section 72.011(2) are jurisdictional, and therefore, failure to comply precludes the circuit court from entertaining jurisdiction over the matter. Department of Revenue v. Nu-Life Health and Fitness Center, 623 So. 2d 747, 752 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The court below determined that the 60-day period was tolled because the Department failed to sufficiently promulgate rules of procedure by which the taxpayer shall be notified as required by section 72.011(2). The trial c…
• Newsweek, Inc. v. Dep't OF Revenue OF THE State OF Fla., 689 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
  …to seek a court order approving an alternative arrangement. § 72.011(3)(b)2.; see also Don’s Sod Co., Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Revenue, 661 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). See generally Florida Dep’t of Revenue v. Nu-Life Health and Fitness Center, 623 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)(section 72.011 not an [*364] unconstitutional deprivation of access to courts, because the taxpayer has the alternative of seeking a waiver from the Department of the obligation to pay the contested tax into the registry of the c…