ALEX HOFRICHTER, P.A. F/K/A HOFRICHTER & QUIAT, P.A., AND ALEX HOFRICHTER, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
DONALD S. ZUCKERMAN, P.A., ZUCKERMAN & VENDITTI, P.A., AND DONALD S. ZUCKERMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-09-07
No. 92-2075
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
623 So. 2d 829 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the post-judgment order denying discovery in aid of execution based on the appellee Donald S. Zuckerman’s invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination, without prejudice to the appellants [Alex Hofrichter, P.A. and Aex Hofri-chter, individually] to raise in the trial court on remand an issue which was expressly reserved by the trial court for future determination, namely, whether the appellee Donald S. Zuckerman has, by his conduct, waived his right to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in this proceeding. See, e.g., United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F. 2d 1349, 1356 (11th Cir.1991); Rainerman v. Eagle Nat'l Bank of Miami, 541 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Alex Hofrichter, P.A. v. Zuckerman & Venditti, P.A., 710 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
    …Zuckerman v. Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., 629 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), aff'd, 646 So. 2d 187 (Fla.1994); Donald S. Zuckerman, P.A. v.Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., 629 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Alex Hofrichter, P.A. v. Donald S. Zuckerman, P.A., 623 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Zuckerman v. Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., 622 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). . For present purposes these claims must be taken as true, as the present proceeding arises on review of a summary judgment. . The decision in Rosen v. Mar…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw